SHOULD I USE IERF OR FCCPT FOR EVALUATION IF I NEED MY PT SYLLABUS TRANSLATED?
As with anything in life, there are advantages and disadvantages to both options. Many of our clients complain that FCCPT fees are high and they take forever to send reports. IERF, on the other hand, charges lesser fees and provides faster reports. IERF, it seems, is a very good option for physiotherapists that have documents written in English, such as candidates from England, India, Philippines, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand, South Africa, Canada (non Quebec) Nigeria and a host of other African countries. If the documents are written in a language other than English, the comparison tips in favor of FCCPT, despite the longer wait periods. Why is that? Simple. While FCCPT requires a certified translation of sections of the syllabus, IERF requires everything translated in syllabus, except for the bibliography. That requirement can be costly indeed. Let us take an extreme case. There is a university in Colombia, Universidad Manuela Beltran, that...